For some strange reason, even though the website promotes itself as a science and technology site, many of the visitors who comment are blatantly anti-science. With this article only a minority of comments addressed the substance of the paper. The majority were denigrating science. The comments included:
and he needs a big grant to study it
They are losing the battle on CO2 grounds, and are desperate to find some other “greenhouse” gas to keep scaremongering and getting grants. Pathetic.
I’m so tired and over all this hyped up science.
Only the application of more grant money can save us from the oncoming disaster
Just shows how silly some people have become
Methinks they have been partaking too much of this Nitrous Oxide themselves
Science is dead. Why should I believe any of this doomsday propaganda?
They sure are gullible. The risk and drama must be high because the cry for funding is so strong. These guys are kinda stupid.
I think he “May” be looking for grant money so he “Can” fund his research.
What a bogus article. Actually I want to say what a crap article. What crap science. ... I don’t think Science or Nature can be trusted. What about the other publications. Are they all on the take, too?
Yep. Grant Forcing.
Obviously the Gravy Train that runs on the old Grant Rail Road Line is behind all this junk.
Feed-me-back-some-grant-money is more like it.
The sound of science. Coming off the RAILS. And HOW many faeries dance on the head of a pin?
I love this kind of “science”, short on facts and long on “may” and “could” and “might”. ... Science Magazine just keeps sinking to new lower lows.
Whatever next? One can only hope that this truly ridiculous “research” will only add to the growing awareness of the general public that the whole thing is one big multi-governmental con. I thought we’d already passed the point where it could not get any more farcical. Clearly I was wrong.
The only thing that must be killed ASAP is our tax funding of all this CAGW baloney. The sooner the better.
Another howler from their article: "An increase in horizontal respiration rate gradients toward low-oxygen oceanic eastern boundaries could also increase N2O production. Some models predict a deeper thermocline (lower respiration) as a result of global warming; others suggest the opposite (13)." Well, that science is settled. Either way, it requires more funding.
… or maybe they are just desperate scientists trying to extort a grant from the government.
“research” as represented in this paper is a threat to truly protecting the environment – we cant properly allocate research dollars to true problems if everything is disingenuously pitched as a “crisis”
Another problem is identified, more calamities predicted. $billions for additional research must be granted and spent.
Note: This looks to be the first blog article I wrote about Anthony Watts' climate conspiracy blog WUWT. I've now archived the article so you can see for yourself that it hasn't changed in at least five years. Here is a link to the press release in Science Daily, which has links to two papers - in Science and in PNAS.
Sou 10 January 2015 at 8:11 pm AEDT